<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Mohaghegh Ardabili</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of School Psychology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>22520821</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The effect of metadiscourse markers presence on high school EFL learners reading comprehension</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The effect of metadiscourse markers presence on high school EFL learners reading comprehension</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>93</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>106</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">65</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">d-2-2-92-4-6</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>R</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abdi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor English Language Teaching at University of Mohaghegh Ardabili</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohammadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>English teacher, Ministry of Education, Namin</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>15</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study investigates the effect of metadiscourse markers presence on reading&lt;br /&gt;comprehension, and also explores the effect of metadiscourse awareness of learners&lt;br /&gt;on reading comprehension performance. A total of 96 participants, studying in preuniversity&lt;br /&gt;centers, in Namin and Ardabil cities were selected to take part in the&lt;br /&gt;study based on their scores on Nelson Proficiency Test. Those who scored one&lt;br /&gt;standard deviation above the mean were selected as high level groups and those&lt;br /&gt;who scored one standard deviation below the mean were assigned to the low level&lt;br /&gt;groups. The participants were then randomly assigned to four groups. The first and&lt;br /&gt;the second groups, i.e. high experimental group and low experimental group,&lt;br /&gt;received the metadiscursively stripped reading text. The third and the fourth&lt;br /&gt;groups, i.e. high control group and low control group received metadiscursively undoctored&lt;br /&gt;reading text. Hawing read the texts, all the participants took the reading&lt;br /&gt;comprehension test. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data. The&lt;br /&gt;analysis showed that the participants performed better on the un-doctored texts.&lt;br /&gt;Also, based on the results of the follow-up questionnaire, the learners were divided&lt;br /&gt;into high and low level of awareness and then their scores on reading test were&lt;br /&gt;compared through a t-test. The results showed that the learners with more&lt;br /&gt;awareness of metadiscourse markers performed better on reading comprehension&lt;br /&gt;test. The results were argued to have implications for English languge material&lt;br /&gt;production and teaching.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study investigates the effect of metadiscourse markers presence on reading&lt;br /&gt;comprehension, and also explores the effect of metadiscourse awareness of learners&lt;br /&gt;on reading comprehension performance. A total of 96 participants, studying in preuniversity&lt;br /&gt;centers, in Namin and Ardabil cities were selected to take part in the&lt;br /&gt;study based on their scores on Nelson Proficiency Test. Those who scored one&lt;br /&gt;standard deviation above the mean were selected as high level groups and those&lt;br /&gt;who scored one standard deviation below the mean were assigned to the low level&lt;br /&gt;groups. The participants were then randomly assigned to four groups. The first and&lt;br /&gt;the second groups, i.e. high experimental group and low experimental group,&lt;br /&gt;received the metadiscursively stripped reading text. The third and the fourth&lt;br /&gt;groups, i.e. high control group and low control group received metadiscursively undoctored&lt;br /&gt;reading text. Hawing read the texts, all the participants took the reading&lt;br /&gt;comprehension test. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data. The&lt;br /&gt;analysis showed that the participants performed better on the un-doctored texts.&lt;br /&gt;Also, based on the results of the follow-up questionnaire, the learners were divided&lt;br /&gt;into high and low level of awareness and then their scores on reading test were&lt;br /&gt;compared through a t-test. The results showed that the learners with more&lt;br /&gt;awareness of metadiscourse markers performed better on reading comprehension&lt;br /&gt;test. The results were argued to have implications for English languge material&lt;br /&gt;production and teaching.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">metadiscourse</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">reading comprehension</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">teaching English</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">reading passages</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsp.uma.ac.ir/article_65_0b2c45c7e531ff8fe3f4979db52e4374.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
