رواسازی و اعتباریابی پرسش‌نامه تدریس تحول‌آفرین (TTQ) در بین دانش آموزان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

2 کارشناس ارشد تحقیقات آموزشی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

10.22098/jsp.2018.693

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف رواسازی و اعتباریابی پرسش­نامه تدریس تحول­آفرین در دانش­آموزان شهر اردبیل انجام پذیرفت. جامعه‌ی آماری مورد مطالعه، دانش­آموزان پایه­ی ششم ابتدایی آموزش و پرورش ناحیه‌ یک شهر اردبیل، به تعداد 2415 نفر در سال تحصیلی 94-1393 بودند که تعداد 490 نفر به روش خوشه‌ای چندمرحله­ای انتخاب شدند. اعتبار پرسش­نامۀ تدریس تحول­آفرین بر اساس آلفای کرونباخ 83/0 و با استفاده از روش دو نیمه کردن، 77/0 به­دست آمد. بررسی‌های مربوط به روایی محتوا و سازه پرسش­نامۀ تدریس تحول­آفرین، مؤید روایی پرسش­نامه مذکور است. یافته‏های حاصل از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی همانند فرم اصلی، چهار عامل نفوذ آرمانی (ایده­آل)، انگیزه الهام­بخش، تحریک ذهنی و ملاحظات فردی را مورد تأیید قرار داد. با توجه به نتایج به­دست آمده می­توان گفت که پرسش­نامۀ تدریس تحول­آفرین ابزاری قابل اعتماد و روا برای اندازه­گیری تدریس تحول­آفرین است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Validation of the transformational teaching questionnaire (TTQ)

نویسندگان [English]

  • A Rezaei Sharif 1
  • M. R Ebrahimkhani 2
1 Assistant Professor of Educational Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
2 Master of Educational Research, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
چکیده [English]

Transformational Teaching Questionnaire (TTQ) was developed for the measurement of transformational teaching. This study examined psychometric properties of TTQ. TTQ has been drawn from transformational leadership theory (Bass & Riggio, 2006) in school-based contexts by Beauchamp and Etal (2010). The population included all school pupils of Ardabil city. The data were collected from 490 students who enrolled in schools during 2013-2014. The sample was selected using multistage cluster sampling. The evaluation of reliability with internal consistency and test-retest methods showed that TTQ's reliability based on Cronbach's alpha was 0.83 and using the split-half it was 0.77. The results showed that the content, discriminant and construct validity of the questionnaire were desirable. Confirmatory factor analysis as the main form revealed four correlated but distinct factors which include idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration. Based on the results, it can be said that TTQ is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of transformational teaching.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • psychometric properties
  • validitation
  • transformational leadership
  • teaching

مراجع

 
Anding, J. M. (2005). An interview with Robert E. Quinn—Entering the fundamental state of leadership: Reflections on the path to transformational teaching. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4,487–495.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2002). Developing potential across a full range of leadership: cases on transactional and transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bass, B.M., Avolio, J.B., Jung, D. I. & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting Unit Performance by Assessing Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (2), 207–218.
Beauchamp, M. R., Barling, J., Li, Z., Morton, K. L., Keith, S. E & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Dvelopment and Psychometric Properties of the Transformational Teaching Questionnaire. Journal of Health Psychology. 15(8) 1123–1134.
Beauchamp, M. R., & Morton, K. L. (2011). Transformational teaching and physical activity engagement among adolescents. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 39, 133–139.
Bogler, R., Caspi, A., & Roccas, S. (2013). Transformatinal and Passive Leadership: An initial investigation of university instructors as leaders in a virtual learning environment. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. 41(3), 372-392.
Boyd, B. L. (2009). Using a case study to develop the transformational teaching theory. Journal of Leadership Education, 7, 50–59.
Cranton, P.(2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hu, L., Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6: 1-55
Linde, T. (2004). Transformational leadership and its relationship with personality preferences in South African organizations. Short Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister ComerceII, business Management, Rand Afeikaans University.
Mok, M. M. C., Flynn, M. (2002). Determinants of students quality of school life: A path model. Learning Environments Research, 5, 275-300.
Noland, A & Richards, K. (2014). The Relationship among Transformational Teaching and Student Motivation and Learning, The Journal of Effective Teaching an online journal devoted to teaching excellence, 14, (3), 5-20.
Ricketts, J. C., Rudd, R. D. (2005). Critical Thinking Skills of Selected Youth Leaders: the Efficacy of Critical Thinking Disposition, Leaders and Academic performance, Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(1): 32-43. 
Rosebrough, T. R., & Leverett, R. G. (2011). Transformational teaching in the information age: Making why and how we teach relevant to students. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Slavich, G., M. (2005), October. Transformational teaching. E-xcellence in Teaching, Volume 5. Retrieved from http://www.teachpsych.org/ebooks/eit2005/eit05-11.html.
Slavich, G. M. & Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Transformational Teaching: Theoretical Underpinnings, Basic Principles, and Core Methods, Educ Psychol Rev, doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار