ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس شایستگی دیجیتال در جامعه آموزشی (معلمان، دانش‌آموزان و والدین) و برای تمامی سطوح آموزشی (ابتدایی، متوسطه و دانشگاه)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران

2 گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس شایستگی دیجیتال در جامعه آموزشی (معلمان، دانش‌آموزان و والدین) و در تمامی سطوح (ابتدایی، متوسطه و دانشگاه) در ایران بود.
روش: روش پژوهش حاضر، توصیفی و از نوع تحلیل عاملی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش، شامل کلیه دانش‌آموزان، والدین و معلمان شهر کرمانشاه در سال تحصیلی 1404-1403 بود که تعداد 240 نفر به روش‌ نمونه‌گیری در دسترس پس از حذف داده‌های ناقص انتخاب و در پژوهش حاضر شرکت کردند. ابزار پژوهش حاضر، مقیاس مقیاس ‌شایستگی دیجیتال سورینا-آلکانترا و همکاران (2025) بود. پس از گردآوری داده‌های لازم، تحلیل‌ها در دو سطح توصیفی (فراوانی، درصد فراوانی، میانگین، انحراف معیار، چولگی و کشیدگی) و استنباطی (تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، ضریب آلفای کرونباخ، همبستگی پیرسون و روایی همگرا و واگرا) با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهایSPSS-27 و AMOS-24 انجام گردید.
یافته‌ها: نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی نشان داد که شاخص‌های برازندگی مدل شش عاملی رضایت‌بخش و قابل قبول بودند. پایایی بر حسب ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برای کل مقیاس 96/0 و برای عامل‌ها بین 80/0 و 93/0 قرار داشت. همچنین با استفاده از شاخص AVE، شرط روایی همگرا برقرار بود.
نتیجه گیری: بر اساس نتایج پژوهش حاضر، مقیاس شایستگی دیجیتال ابزاری مناسب با ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی قابل قبول برای سنجش شایستگی دیجیتال در جامعه آموزشی (معلمان، دانش‌آموزان و والدین) و در تمامی سطوح (ابتدایی، متوسطه و دانشگاه) در ایران است. می‌توان با استفاده از این مقیاس ارزیابی دقیقی از شایستگی دیجیتال جامعه هدف به عمل آورد و برنامه‌های مورد نظر را در خصوص آن‌ها اجرا کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Digital Competence Scale in the Educational Community (Teachers, Students, and Parents) and for all Educational Levels (Elementary, Secondary and University)

نویسندگان [English]

  • ezatollah ghadampour 1
  • shirin emami al agha 2
  • Erfan Bahrami 1
1 Department of Psychology, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Department of Psychology, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: The aim of study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Digital Competence Scale in the educational community (teachers, students, and parents) and at all levels (elementary, secondary, and university) in Iran.
Methods & Materials: The method of the present research was factor analysis. The statistical population of the study included all students, parents, and teachers in Kermanshah in the academic year 2024-2025, of which 240 people were selected using convenience sampling method. The research tool was the Digital Competence Scale by Sorina-Alcantara et al. (2025). After collecting the necessary data, analyses were performed at two levels: descriptive (frequency, frequency percentage, mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis) and inferential (confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, Pearson correlation, and convergent and divergent validity) using SPSS-27 and AMOS-24 software.
Results: The results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the goodness-of-fit indices of the six-factor model were satisfactory and acceptable. The reliability based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.96 for the entire scale and between 0.80 and 0.93 for the factors. Also, using the AVE index, the condition for convergent validity was met.
Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, the Digital Competence Scale is a suitable tool with acceptable psychometric properties for measuring digital competence in the educational community (teachers, students, and parents) and at all levels (elementary, secondary, and university) in Iran. This scale can be used to accurately assess the digital competence of the target population and implement relevant programs for them.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Digital competence
  • validity
  • reliability
احمدی، ش.، شیخ الاسلامی، ع.، نخستین گلدوست، ا. (1403). مقایسه‌ی تاثیر آموزش مهارت‌های ابراز وجود و راهبردهای خودنظارتی بر اشتیاق تحصیلی در دانش‌آموزان مبتلا به ناتوانی یادگیری. مجله ناتوانی های یادگیری،  14(1)، 1-12.   [DOI: 10.22098/jld.2024.14482.2147]
تقی زاده هیر، س.، نریمانی، آ.، شهبازی، س. (1402). اثربخشی آموزش جرأت‌ورزی بر بهبود عزت نفس و تنظیم شناختی هیجان کودکان دارای اختلال یادگیری خاص. مجله ناتوانی های یادگیری،13(1)، 6-16. [DOI:10.22098/jld.2024.14280.2137 ]
سلطانی، م.، نریمانی، م.، موسی زاده، ت. (1403). بررسی اثر بخشی آموزش راهبرد های خود تعلیمی کلامی بر سازگاری اجتماعی و هماهنگی دیداری حرکتی دانش آموزان دارای ناتوانی های یادگیری. مجله ناتوانی های یادگیری، 14(2)، 1-11. 
شیخ‌الاسلامی، ع.، سیداسماعیلی قمی، ن.، سلمانی، ع. و شارعی، آ. (1404). اثربخشی توانمندسازی روانشناختی بر خودپنداره‌ی تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان با عملکرد تحصیلی پایین. پژوهش در نظام‌های آموزشی. 19(68): 35-21. [Doi:10.22034/jiera.2025.531981.3339]
نریمانی، م.، جباری قوزلوجه، ع.، و شهریور، آ. (1404). اثربخشی آموزش مبتنی بر توسعه راهبرد خودتنظیمی بر بهبود خودکارآمدی، کنترل هیجان و انگیزه پیشرفت در دانش‌آموزان دارای اختلالات یادگیری. ناتوانی‌های یادگیری، 14(4)، 94–80.   [DOI: 10.22098/jld.2025.17297.2251]
نریمانی، م.، و صادق‌زاده بلیل، ن. (1403). مقایسه سبک‌های تفکر و بهزیستی تحصیلی در دانش‌آموزان با و بدون ناتوانی یادگیری. ناتوانی‌های یادگیری، 14(1)،66-74.   [DOI: 10.22098/jld.2024.14819.2159]
Ahmadi, SH., Shykholeslami, A., & Nokhostin Goldoos. (2024). Comparing the effect of teaching self-expression skills and teaching self-monitoring strategies on academic engagement in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(1),1-12. (Persian) [Doi: 10.22098/jld.2024.15394.2173]
Akintayo, N. O. T., Eden, N. C. A., Ayeni, O., & Chisom, N. (2024). Evaluating the impact of educational technology on learning outcomes in the higher education sector: a systematic review. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(5), 1395–1422. [DOI:10.51594/ijmer.v6i5.1091]
Alharbi, B. A., Ibrahem, U. M., Moussa, M. A., Alrashidy, M. A., & Saleh, S. F. (2023). Parents’ digital skills and their development in the context of the Corona pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). [DOI:10.1057/s41599-023-01556-7]
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. [DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588]
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203805534]
Cabaleiro-Cerviño, G., & Vera, C. (2020). The impact of educational technologies in higher education. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 20(20), 155–169. [DOI:10.26817/16925777.711]
Cabero-Almenara, J., Romero-Tena, R., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2020). Evaluation of teacher digital competence frameworks through expert judgement: the use of the expert competence coefficient. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 275–293. [DOI:10.7821/naer.2020.7.578]
Carrera, X., Tió, E. V., & Bailón, M. B. (2011). Instrumento de evaluación de competencias digitales para adolescentes en riesgo social. Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 35, a154–a154. [DOI:10.21556/edutec.2011.35.410]
Cattaneo, A., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2025). How do vocational teachers use technology? The role of perceived digital competence and perceived usefulness in technology use across different teaching profiles. Vocations and Learning, 18(1). [DOI:10.1007/s12186-025-09359-4]
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263–282. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x]
Díaz-Burgos, A., García-Sánchez, J.-N., Álvarez-Fernández, M. L., & de Brito-Costa, S. M. (2024). Psychological and educational factors of digital competence optimization interventions Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Lockdown: A systematic review. Sustainability, 16(1), 51. [DOI:10.3390/su16010051]
Evurulobi, C. I., Dagunduro, A. O., & Ajuwon, O. A. (2024). Theoretical perspectives on digital literacy programs: A comparative study of initiatives in Africa and the United States. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(3), 2708–2714. [DOI:10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2853]
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4]
García-Ruiz, R., Fernández, M. B., & Ramírez, S. (2023). Evaluación de la Competencia Digital Docente: instrumentos, resultados y propuestas. Revisión sistemática de la literatura. Educacion Xx1, 26(1), 273–301. [DOI:10.5944/educxx1.33520]
Ghomi, M., & Redecker, C. (2019). Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu): Development and Evaluation of a Self-assessment Instrument for Teachers’ Digital Competence. International Conference on Computer Supported Education. [DOI:10.5220/0007679005410548]
Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Magaña, E. C., Palmero, J. R., & Tomczyk, Ł. (2023). The digital competence of the rural teacher of primary education in the mentoring process: a study by teaching speciality and gender. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. [DOI:10.1108/jrit-05-2023-0050]
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson. [URL: https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1841396]
Heidari, E., Mehrvarz, M., Marzooghi, R., & Stoyanov, S. (2021). The role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students’ digital competence and academic engagement during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 1154–1166. [DOI:10.1111/jcal.12553]
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York Guilford. [URL: https://www.guilford.com/author/Rex-B-Kline]
Li, Y., García‐Holgado, A., & Martínez‐Abad, F. (2023). Digital competence of K-12 pre-service and in-service teachers in China: a systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(4), 679–693. [DOI:10.1007/s12564-023-09888-4]
Lin, R., Yang, J., Jiang, F., & Li, J. (2022). Does teacher’s data literacy and digital teaching competence influence empowering students in the classroom? Evidence from China. Education and Information Technologies. [DOI:10.1007/s10639-022-11274-3]
Llorente-Cejudo, C., Barragán-Sánchez, R., Puig-Gutiérrez, M., & Romero-Tena, R. (2022). Social inclusion as a perspective for the validation of the “DigCompEdu Check-In” questionnaire for teaching digital competence. Education and Information Technologies. [DOI:10.1007/s10639-022-11273-4]
López-Belmonte, J., Pozo-Sánchez, S., Fuentes-Cabrera, A., & Trujillo-Torres, J.-M. (2019). Analytical Competences of teachers in big data in the Era of Digitalized Learning. Education Sciences, 9(3), 177. [DOI:10.3390/educsci9030177]
Ma, H., & Ismail, L. (2025). Bibliometric analysis and systematic review of digital competence in education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). [DOI:10.1057/s41599-025-04401-1]
Mattar, J., Santos, C. C., & Cuque, L. M. (2022). Analysis and comparison of international digital competence frameworks for education. Education Sciences, 12(12), 932. [DOI: 10.3390/educsci12120932]
Mengual-Andrés, S., Roig-Vila, R., & Mira, J. B. (2016). Delphi study for the design and validation of a questionnaire about digital competences in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1). [DOI:10.1186/s41239-016-0009-y]
Momdjian, L., Manegre, M., & Gutiérrez-Colón, M. (2025). A study of preservice teachers’ digital competence development: Exploring the role of direct instruction, integrated practice, and modeling. Evaluation and Program Planning, 109, 102538. [DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102538]
Muammar, S., Hashim, K. F. B., & Panthakkan, A. (2022). Evaluation of digital competence level among educators in UAE Higher Education Institutions using Digital Competence of Educators (DigComEdu) framework. Education and Information Technologies. [DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-11296-x]
Nagel, I. (2025). Promoting professional digital competence in student teachers: teacher educators’ task perception matters. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1–19. [DOI:10.1080/02619768.2025.2482932]
Narimani, M., Jabbari Qizlojah, A., & Shahrivar, A. (2025). Examining the effectiveness of self-regulation strategy development training on improving self-efficacy, emotional regulation, and achievement motivation in students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 14(4), 80–94. (Persian) [DOI: 10.22098/jld.2025.17297.2251]
Narimani, M., & Sadeghzadeh Belil, N. (2024).  Comparison of thinking styles and academic well-being in students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 14(1), 66-74. (Persian) [DOI: 10.22098/jld.2024.14819.2159]
Nguyen, T. Q., Ngoc, P. T. A., Phuong, H. A., Dang, D. P. T., Hiep, P. C., McClelland, R., & Noroozi, O. (2024). Digital competence of Vietnamese citizens: An application of digcomp framework and the role of individual factors. Education and Information Technologies. [DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-12585-3]
Pedaste, M., Kallas, K., & Baucal, A. (2023). Digital competence test for learning in schools: Development of items and scales. Computers & Education, 203, 104830. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104830]
Prastyaningtyas, E. W., Ausat, A. M. A., Muhamad, L. F., Wanof, M. I., & Suherlan, S. (2023). The role of information technology in improving human resources career development. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 5(3), 266–275. [DOI: 10.47233/jteksis.v5i3.870]
Racheva, V., & Aleksieva, L. (2025). Teaching, learning and assessing digital competences in (Bulgarian) primary education: A scoping review. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3303, 040012. [DOI: 10.1063/5.0245997]
Sá, M. J., & Serpa, S. (2020). COVID-19 and the Promotion of Digital Competences in Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4520–4528. [DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081020]
Saltos-Rivas, R., Novoa-Hernández, P., & Rodríguez, R. S. (2023). Understanding university teachers’ digital competencies: a systematic mapping study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12). [DOI:10.1007/s10639-023-11669-w]
Sánchez-Canut, S., Usart-Rodríguez, M., Grimalt-Álvaro, C., Martínez-Requejo, S., & Lores-Gómez, B. (2023). Professional digital competence: Definition, frameworks, measurement, and gender differences: A systematic literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023, 1–22. [DOI: 10.1155/2023/8897227]
Sheykholeslami, A., Seyedesmaili Ghomi, N., Salmani, A. & Sharei, A. (2025). The effectiveness of psychological empowerment on academic self-concept of students with low academic performance. Journal of Research in Educational Systems19(68), 21-35. (Persian) [Doi:10.22034/jiera.2025.531981.3339]
Sillat, L. H., Tammets, K., & Laanpere, M. (2021). Digital competence assessment methods in higher education: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(8), 402. [DOI: 10.3390/educsci11080402]
Soltani, M., & Narimani, M., & Mousazadeh, T. (2025). Investigating the effectiveness of teaching verbal self-teaching strategies on social adaptation and visual motor coordination of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(2), 1-11. (Persian) [DOI:10.22098/jld.2023.13578.2120]
Soriano-Alcantara, J. M., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2024). Exploring digital competencies: validation and reliability of an instrument for the educational community and for all educational stages. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(1), 307–326. [DOI: 10.1007/s10758-024-09741-6]
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). Digital competence in early childhood education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4). [DOI: 10.1007/s10639-023-11972-6]
Taghizadeh Hir, S., Narimani, A., & Shahbazi, S. (2023). The effectiveness of assertiveness training on improving self-esteem and cognitive emotion regulation in children with special learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13(1), 6-16. (Persian) [DOI: 10.22098/jld.2024.14280.2137]
Tinmaz, H., Lee, Y.-T., Fanea-Ivanovici, M., & Baber, H. (2022). A systematic review on digital literacy. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). [DOI: 10.1186/s40561-022-00204-y]
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. [DOI: 10.1007/bf02291170]
Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2022). Development and validation of students’ digital competence scale (SDiCoS). International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1). [DOI: 10.1186/s41239-022-00330-0]
Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., Liu, Y., & Jing, Y. (2024). Education reform and change driven by digital technology: a bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–17. [DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y]
Yuanyuan, P., Alias, B. S., Mansor, A. N., & Nasir, M. K. B. M. (2024). Validation of the teachers’ digital competence instrument using Rasch measurement model. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7). [DOI: 10.62754/joe.v3i7.4564]
Zakharov, K., Komarova, A., Baranova, T., & Gulk, E. (2021). Information literacy and digital competence of teachers in the age of digital transformation. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, 12077. [DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202127312077]
Zhao, Y., Llorente, A. M. P., & Gómez, M. C. S. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168(168), 104212. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212]